Skylum luminar update1/28/2024 ![]() ![]() Sync adjustments to a new image without seeing the original image in low resolution displayed while adjustments are syncing.Apply a Preset without disabling the Sky AI and Sky Enhancer AI tools.Mark a Preset as Favorite without seeing the list of Presets scroll up and down.From the Layers tab, click “My Images”, “See All” and then the “Get More Assets” button and be redirected to the Luminar Marketplace as expected.Install this update today to take advantage of these new features and performance improvements. On top of that, Luminar Neo 1.9.0 is faster and more stable, as we’ve caught and fixed a number of bugs. You will also see performance improvements with the RAW Develop and masking tools, making your photo editing experience more efficient. Now, you can back out of an edit and reapply it easily, making experimenting with different editing tools more convenient. The long-anticipated Undo/Redo functionality is here. And it doesn't duplicate your host software's database efforts.With each update, we strive to make Luminar Neo more useful and reliable, so let's explore the improvements included in Luminar Neo 1.9.0. So I'd appreciate it if those who have more recent versions would tell me if some of the above points have been addressed.įYI, I think Topaz Studio 2 is a better, more reliable product, if this sort of purposely non-complete editor/plugin appeals to you. I'm not all that impressed with L4, certainly not enough to try out more recent versions. But so far, I haven't felt a strong need to replace the sky all that often in my photos. I mean it WAS free, so I have no sunk cost in L4 that I need to rationalize. Is easy sky replacement enough of a reason for me to keep L4? I don't know. In this particular case, I think this comparison is fair since the points listed above, pretty much apply to EVERY version of ACDSee Ultimate since it's original release. Plus, I can use 3rd party plugins with ACDSee Ultimate. Everything L4 can do, ACDSee can do better, faster, and more reliably. With the possible exception of sky replacement, an ACDSee Ultimate user with software at least 4 years old has no real reason to use L4. It always quits L4 and usually returns to ACDSee. Just about any time I cancel an action, it cancels the edit completely and returns it to ACDSee.(and you can't put Gigapixel AI in the L4 workflow!) That, to me, is why Luminar needs to be able to use noise control plugins. And at this point, ACDSee's native noise control is now just starting to get competent after being down where Luminar 4 is now. Especially when compared to ACDSee's Noise control and Light EQ. Noise control and luminosity control aren't that great.What Luminar means by "Installing Plugins" is that you can use Luminar as a plugin with other tools. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |